You don't hear those words every day! But getting a handle on their meanings is helpful...
The prevailing dogma of our age is that the Sun is one star among untold billions and that the Earth is just one of eight planets orbiting that star (Poor Pluto was demoted). And the Moon? It is merely a satellite of the Earth, like the satellites of Mars or Jupiter. Add some asteroids and comets and you have what is called the "solar system" which in turn is just part of the Milky Way galaxy which in turn is but another galaxy among billions of other galaxies.
In a nutshell, that is the cosmology most take as factual. In other words, that is the basic conception of the structure of the universe which is commonly held. It is called science but is actually modern mythology.
And to go along with it, we are told that way back in the depths of deep time past there was a cosmic egg. It suddenly exploded...there was a big bang! Then over untold billions of years, galaxies and stars with their orbiting planets and other celestial bodies formed. Then, about four billion years ago, life began on this speck of cosmic dust we call the Earth. Evolution kicked in and...Voila! From a single cell all the Earth's life forms including humanity came to be.
That is the cosmogony most have been taught. In other words, that is basic conception of the origin of the universe (and of life) as commonly held. That pseudo-science is also modern mythology.
Cosmology asks: What is the structure of the universe? Cosmogony asks: What is the origin of the universe? Let's expose both mythological answers to the light of God's word.
Scripture includes the Earth as part of God's creation, but consistently refers to the Heavens and the Earth as distinct components of creation. The Heavens and the Earth were formed on creation day one. The sun, moon, and stars were made on creation day four and placed in the heavens.This ancient truth is reflected in how ancient peoples classified the heavenly bodies.
The word planet is from the Greek phrase ASTERES PLANETES, which means "wandering star" (cf. Jude 13). Men of old did not distinguish between heavenly bodies which seem to have a fixed position from those which moved in the nightime sky. They were all called stars. Some wandered, some did not. And as they did with the stars of both kinds, they assumed an Earthward focus and purpose for the Moon and the Sun, those two great lights of Genesis 1:16 where that Earthward focus and divine purpose are revealed.
By way of our technology, we moderns have learned that some of those lights our forebears called stars are very distant, gigantic balls of burning gas. Our telescopes show us that other bodies which they also called stars are smaller, closer bodies which orbit the Sun. The Sun shares characterisics with those giant fireballs, but Scripture never refers to the Sun as a star. The Earth and the Moon share some of the characteristics of the wanderers, but Scripture never lumps the Earth and Moon in with them. Why should we? Why should Bible believing people accomodate the pagan interpretation of the structure of the universe?
Likewise the "deep time" required by the reigning mythological cosmogony is woefully inconsistent with faithfulness to the inerrant and infallible, God-breathed Word. Yes, the apostle Peter wrote "But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day" (2 Peter 3:8). Right...it is so WITH THE LORD, Who is from everlasting to everlasting, but it is not so with us who are here today and gone tomorrow!
That truth which Peter articulated does not subvert the truth of Genesis 1 where the word "day" (Hebrew YOM) is used several times in the account of the divine creation week with unmistakeable reference to that period of time we divide into 24 hours, the ordinary day.
Adam was created on day six, and we are told that he lived 930 years. Carefully tabulating the geneological info on Adam and his descendants through Noah (Genesis 5:5ff) and moving forward in the sacred record from the Great Flood, we learn from Scripture that the entire cosmos is approximately six thousand years old. This conclusion is scorned and mocked by the world, so what? We honor what God's word teaches about the origin of the universe.
In short, we count theology as the "*queen of sciences", submitting the natural sciences to her.
A little over two thousand years ago, the Second Person of the blessed Trinity became incarnate in order to save His people from their sins. Regardless of the astrophysical relationships of the Earth and the heavenly lights, should not the location of Jesus' real, physical body (while He was here on Earth or after His bodily ascension) be regarded as the spiritual center of the cosmos? In any manner in which centrality counts, we live in a Christo-centric cosmos!
* The eminent theologian Thomas Aquinas did not use the phrase "queen of sciences" in his masterful Summa Theologica, but that renowned work (written c. 1270 A.D.) does communicate the concept. Other sciences are based on human observation and fallible. Believing theology, which though fallible in itself, is based on infallible revelation - the holy Bible.